Second-wave feminism

The Feminist Movement, or the Women's Liberation Movement in the United States refers to a period of feminist activity which began during the early 1960s and lasted through the early 1990s.[1]

Whereas first-wave feminism focused mainly on overturning legal obstacles to equality (i.e. voting rights, property rights), second-wave feminism addressed a wide range of issues: de facto inequalities, official legal inequalities, sexuality, family, the workplace, and, controversially, reproductive rights.[2] It also tried and failed to add the Equal Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution. Many feminists view the second-wave feminist era as ending with the intra-feminism disputes of the Feminist Sex Wars, over issues such as sexuality and pornography.[3][4][5][6][7]

Contents

Overview

The second wave of feminism in North America came as a response to the experiences of women after World War II.[8] The late 1940s post-war boom, an era characterized by an unprecedented economic growth, a baby boom, and a move to the suburbs encouraged companionate marriages. This life was clearly illustrated by the media of the time; for example television shows such as Father Knows Best and Leave It to Beaver idealized domesticity.[9]

In 1963, in her bestselling book The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan explicitly objected to the mainstream media image of women, stating that placing women at home limited their possibilities, and wasted talent and potential. The perfect nuclear family image depicted and strongly marketed at the time, she wrote, did not reflect happiness and was rather degrading for women.[10] This book is widely credited with having begun second-wave feminism.[11]

French writer Simone de Beauvoir had in the 1940s examined the notion of women being perceived as "other" in the patriarchal society. She went on to conclude that male-centered ideology was being accepted as a norm and enforced by the ongoing development of myths, and that the fact that women are capable of getting pregnant, lactating, and menstruating is in no way a valid cause or explanation to place them as the "second sex".[12] Friedan years later (in 1975) admitted that de Beauvoir's book, published in English in 1953, influenced hers. Indeed, Dijkstra argues that Friedan's book is to a large degree a deradicalized version of ideas first suggested in The Second Sex.[13]

Though it is widely accepted that the movement lasted from the 1960s into the late 1990s, the exact years of the movement are more difficult to pinpoint and are often disputed. The movement is usually believed to have begun in 1963, when "Mother of the Movement" Betty Friedan published her bestseller, The Feminine Mystique and President John F. Kennedy's Presidential Commission on the Status of Women released its report on gender inequality. The report, which revealed great discrimination against women in American life, along with Friedan's book, which spoke to the discontent of many women (especially housewives), led to the formation of many local, state, and federal government women's groups as well as many independent women's liberation organizations. Friedan was referencing a "movement" as early as 1964.[14]

The movement grew with legal victories such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Griswold v. Connecticut Supreme Court ruling of 1965; in 1966 Friedan joined other women and men to found the National Organization for Women.

Amongst the most significant legal victories of the movement after the formation of NOW were a 1967 Executive Order extending full Affirmative Action rights to women, Title IX and the Women's Educational Equity Act (1972 and 1974, respectively, educational equality), Title X (1970, health and family planning), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (1974), the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, the illegalization of marital rape (although not illegalized in all states until 1993[15]), the legalization of no-fault divorce (although not allowed in all states until 2010 [16]), a 1975 law requiring the U.S. Military Academies to admit women, and many Supreme Court cases, perhaps most notably Reed v. Reed of 1971 and Roe v. Wade of 1973. However, the changing of social attitudes towards women is usually considered the greatest success of the women's movement.

By the early 1980s, it was largely perceived that women had met their goals and succeeded in changing social attitudes towards gender roles, repealing oppressive laws that were based on sex, integrating the "boys' clubs" such as Military academies, the United States armed forces, NASA, single-sex colleges, men's clubs, and the Supreme Court, and illegalizing gender discrimination. However, in 1982 adding the Equal Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution failed, three states short of ratification.

Second-wave feminism was largely successful, with the failure of the ratification of the ERA the only major legislative defeat. Efforts to ratify it have continued, and twenty-one states now have ERAs in their state constitutions. Furthermore, many women's groups are still active and are major political forces. As of 2011, more women earn bachelor's degrees than men,[17] half of the Ivy League presidents are women, the numbers of women in government and traditionally male-dominated fields have dramatically increased, and in 2009 the percentage of women in the American workforce temporarily surpassed that of men.[18] The salary of the average American woman has also increased over time, although as of 2008 it is only 77% of the average man's salary.[19] Whether this is due to discrimination is very hotly disputed; feminist groups maintain that it is.

View on popular culture

Second-wave feminists viewed popular culture as sexist, and created pop culture of their own to counteract this. Artist Helen Reddy’s song “I Am Woman” played a large role in popular culture and became a feminist anthem; Reddy came to be known as a "feminist poster girl" or a "feminist icon." [20] “One project of second wave feminism was to create ‘positive’ images of women, to act as a counterweight to the dominant images circulating in popular culture and to raise women’s consciousness of their oppressions." (Arrow, Michelle. 2007).

Timeline of key events

The rise of the second-wave

1953

1960

1961

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

From Miss America to Ms.: Sisterhood is Powerful

1968

1969

1970

1971

The full text of resolution reads:
Joint Resolution of Congress, 1971 Designating August 26 of each year as Women's Equality Day
WHEREAS, the women of the United States have been treated as second-class citizens and have not been entitled the full rights and privileges, public or private, legal or institutional, which are available to male citizens of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the women of the United States have united to assure that these rights and privileges are available to all citizens equally regardless of sex; and
WHEREAS, the women of the United States have designated August 26, the anniversary date of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, as symbol of the continued fight for equal rights: and
WHEREAS, the women of United States are to be commended and supported in their organizations and activities,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that August 26 of each year is designated as "Women's Equality Day," and the President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation annually in commemoration of that day in 1920, on which the women of America were first given the right to vote, and that day in 1970, on which a nationwide demonstration for women's rights took place.

1972

The ERA

1972

The amendment reads:

"Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."

"In this Land of the Free, it is right, and by nature it ought to be, that all men and all women are equal before the law.
Now, therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States of America, to remind all Americans that it is fitting and just to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment adopted by the Congress of the United States of America, in order to secure legal equality for all women and men, do hereby designate and proclaim August 26, 1975, as Women's Equality Day."

1973

1974

"Every layer of society"

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

The 1980s

In the U.S., the 1980s were marked by a decline of the second wave.

The second wave began in this decade in Turkey[29] and in Israel.[30]

1981

1982

Post-feminism in the 1980s

Education

Title IX

Coeducation

One debate which developed in the United States during this time period revolved around the question of coeducation. Most men's colleges in the United States adopted coeducation, often by merging with women's colleges. In addition, some women's colleges adopted coeducation, while others maintained a single-sex student body.

Seven Sisters Colleges

Two of the Seven Sister colleges made transitions during and after the 1960s. The first, Radcliffe College, merged with Harvard University. Beginning in 1963, students at Radcliffe received Harvard diplomas signed by the presidents of Radcliffe and Harvard and joint commencement exercises began in 1970. The same year, several Harvard and Radcliffe dormitories began swapping students experimentally and in 1972 full co-residence was instituted. The departments of athletics of both schools merged shortly thereafter. In 1977, Harvard and Radcliffe signed an agreement which put undergraduate women entirely in Harvard College. In 1999 Radcliffe College was dissolved and Harvard University assumed full responsibility over the affairs of female undergraduates. Radcliffe is now the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study in Women's Studies at Harvard University.

The second, Vassar College, declined an offer to merge with Yale University and instead became coeducational in 1969.

The remaining Seven Sisters decided against coeducation. Mount Holyoke College engaged in a lengthy debate under the presidency of David Truman over the issue of coeducation. On November 6, 1971, "after reviewing an exhaustive study on coeducation, the board of trustees decided unanimously that Mount Holyoke should remain a women's college, and a group of faculty was charged with recommending curricular changes that would support the decision."[32] Smith College also made a similar decision in 1971.[33]

In 1969, Bryn Mawr College and Haverford College (then all male) developed a system of sharing residential colleges. When Haverford became coeducational in 1980, Bryn Mawr discussed the possibly of coeducation as well, but decided against it.[34] In 1983, Columbia University began admitting women after a decade of failed negotiations with Barnard College for a merger along the lines of Harvard and Radcliffe (Barnard has been affiliated with Columbia since 1900, but it continues to be independently governed). Wellesley College also decided against coeducation during this time.

Mississippi University for Women

In 1982, in a 5–4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan that the Mississippi University for Women would be in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause if it denied admission to its nursing program on the basis of gender. Mississippi University for Women, the first public or government institution for women in the United States, changed its admissions policies and became coeducational after the ruling.[35]

In what was her first opinion written for the Supreme Court, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor stated, "In limited circumstances, a gender-based classification favoring one sex can be justified if it intentionally and directly assists members of the sex that is disproportionately burdened." She went on to point out that there are a disproportionate number of women who are nurses, and that denying admission to men "lends credibility to the old view that women, not men, should become nurses, and makes the assumption that nursing is a field for women a self-fulfilling prophecy."[36]

In the dissenting opinions, Justices Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., and William H. Rehnquist suggested that the result of this ruling would be the elimination of publicly supported single-sex educational opportunities. This suggestion has proven to be accurate as there are no public women's colleges in the United States today and, as a result of United States v. Virginia, the last all-male public university in the United States, Virginia Military Institute, was required to admit women. The ruling did not require the university to change its name to reflect its coeducational status and it continues a tradition of academic and leadership development for women by providing liberal arts and professional education to women and men.[37]

Mills College

On May 3, 1990, the Trustees of Mills College announced that they had voted to admit male students.[38] This decision led to a two-week student and staff strike, accompanied by numerous displays of non-violent protests by the students.[39][40] At one point, nearly 300 students blockaded the administrative offices and boycotted classes.[41] On May 18, the Trustees met again to reconsider the decision,[42] leading finally to a reversal of the vote.[43]

Other colleges

Pembroke College merged with Brown University. Sarah Lawrence College declined an offer to merge with Princeton University, becoming coeducational in 1969. Connecticut College also adopted coeducation during the late 1960s. Wells College, previously with a student body of women only, became co-educational in 2005. Douglass College, part of Rutgers University was the last publicly funded women's only college until 2007 when it became coed.

See also

References

  1. ^ Sarah Gamble, ed. The Routledge companion to feminism and postfeminism (2001) p. 25
  2. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/647122/womens-movement
  3. ^ Duggan, Lisa; Hunter, Nan D. (1995). Sex wars: sexual dissent and political culture. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91036-6. 
  4. ^ Hansen, Karen Tranberg; Philipson, Ilene J. (1990). Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a socialist-feminist reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-630-X. 
  5. ^ Gerhard, Jane F. (2001). Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11204-1. 
  6. ^ Leidholdt, Dorchen; Raymond, Janice G (1990). The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism. New York: Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-037457-3. 
  7. ^ Vance, Carole S. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Thorsons Publishers. ISBN 0-04-440593-6. 
  8. ^ Friedan, Betty, The Feminine Mystique (1963)
  9. ^ Knuttila, Murray, 4th ed. 2008. Introducing Sociology: A Critical Approach. Oxford University Press.
  10. ^ Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1988. Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven: Yale University Press
  11. ^ Sweet, Corinne (February 7, 2006). "Betty Friedan". The Independent (London). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/betty-friedan-465800.html. 
  12. ^ Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 1949.
  13. ^ Sandra Dijkstra, "Simone de Beauvoir and Betty Friedan: The Politics of Omission," Feminist Studies, Summer 1980, Vol. 6 Issue 2, pp 290-303
  14. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDZh3nY9clY
  15. ^ http://www.refugehouse.com/resources_marital_rape.html
  16. ^ http://www.divorcenet.com/feed-item/no-fault-divorce-now-law-all-50-states
  17. ^ http://www.mibn.org/site.php/snew/read/demographics_of_working_moms/
  18. ^ Rampell, Catherine (February 6, 2009). "As Layoffs Surge, Women May Pass Men in Job Force". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/business/06women.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=women%20workforce&st=cse. Retrieved April 6, 2010. 
  19. ^ Fitzpatrick, Laura (April 20, 2010). "Why Do Women Still Earn Less Than Men?". Time. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1983185,00.html. 
  20. ^ Arrow. Michelle. 2007. "It Has Become My Personal Anthem": “I Am Woman”, Popular Culture and 1970s Feminism. Australian Feminist Studies 22: 213-230.
  21. ^ Greer, Germaine, The Female Eunuch (N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1st ed. in U.S. 1971, © 1970 & 1971), p. 306 ("The summer ... was ... momentous for the women's movement ... [partly] because Valerie Solanas shot Andy Warhol.... S.C.U.M. ... was big news, battling ... for the front page.").
  22. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1093465/Womens-Strike-for-Equality
  23. ^ "Ms magazine website". About Ms.. http://www.msmagazine.com/about.asp. Retrieved August 15, 2011. 
  24. ^ Steinem, Gloria. "Who is Gloria?". Gloria Steinem Official Website. http://www.gloriasteinem.com/who-is-gloria/. Retrieved August 15, 2011. 
  25. ^ http://www.ufcw.org/womens_history_month/timeline/index.cfm
  26. ^ a b http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/wsweb/timeline.htm
  27. ^ "WOMEN OF THE YEAR: Great Changes, New Chances, Tough Choices". Time. January 5, 1976. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,947597,00.html. Retrieved April 6, 2010. 
  28. ^ http://www.enotes.com/american-court-cases/oregon-v-rideout
  29. ^ Badran, Margot, Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences (Oxford, Eng.: Oneworld, 2009 (ISBN 978-1-85168-556-1)), p. 227 (author sr. fellow, Ctr. for Muslim Christian Understanding, Georgetown Univ., U.S., & fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Ctr. for Scholars, Washington, D.C.).
  30. ^ Freedman, Marcia, Theorizing Israeli Feminism, 1970–2000, in Misra, Kalpana, & Melanie S. Rich, Jewish Feminism in Israel: Some Contemporary Perspectives (Hanover, N.H.: Univ. Press of New England (Brandeis Univ. Press) (Brandeis Ser. on Jewish Women), 1st ed. 2003 (ISBN 1-58465-325-6)), pp. 9–10 (author taught philosphy, Haifa Univ., & women's studies, Oranim Teacher's Seminary, 2d-wave feminist leader, & cofounder Women's Party, editor Kalpana Misra assoc. prof. pol. sci., Univ. of Tulsa, & editor Melanie S. Rich psychologist & chair, Partnership 2000 Women's Forum).
  31. ^ "Women's History Month", archives.gov
  32. ^ "Mount Holyoke:A Detailed History". mtholyoke.edu. http://www.mtholyoke.edu/cic/about/detailed.shtml. 
  33. ^ "Smith Tradition". smith.edu. http://www.smith.edu/collegerelations/presidents.php. 
  34. ^ "A Brief history of Bryn Mawr College". brynmawr.edu. http://www.brynmawr.edu/visit/history.shtml. 
  35. ^ [1]
  36. ^ "Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan", 458 U.S. 718 (1982)
  37. ^ MUW - Planning and Institutional Effectiveness
  38. ^ "Venerable School for Women Is Going Co-ed". nytimes.com.com. 1990-05-04. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30610F73C540C778CDDAC0894D8494D81. 
  39. ^ "Mills Students Protesting Admission of Men". nytimes.com.com. 1990-05-05. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE6DE1738F936A35756C0A966958260. 
  40. ^ Bishop, Katherine (1990-05-06). "Disbelieving and Defiant, Students Vow: No Men". nytimes.com.com. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30616FC355E0C758CDDAC0894D8494D81. Retrieved April 6, 2010. 
  41. ^ "Protest Continues at College Over Decision to Admit Men". nytimes.com.com. 1990-05-08. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE1DE133EF93BA35756C0A966958260. 
  42. ^ "College to Reconsider Decision to Admit Men". nytimes.com.com. 1990-05-12. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE5DA1130F931A25756C0A966958260. 
  43. ^ Bishop, Katherine (1990-05-19). "Women's College Rescinds Its Decision to Admit Men". nytimes.com.com. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30616F63C550C7A8DDDAC0894D8494D81. Retrieved April 6, 2010. 

Further reading